Supreme Court Overturns Landmark Chevron Doctrine, Curbing Federal Government Power
Chevron Doctrine Struck Down in Major Supreme Court Ruling
Historic Decision Shifts Power Balance in Interpretation of Statutes
In a groundbreaking ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has overturned the Chevron doctrine, a legal precedent established in 1984 that gave significant deference to federal agencies' interpretations of ambiguous statutes. The landmark decision shifts the balance of power in statutory interpretation towards the judiciary, curbing the authority of administrative agencies.
The Chevron doctrine, named after the 1984 Supreme Court case Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., held that courts should defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of a statute if it is ambiguous. This doctrine has been widely used by federal courts for decades, giving agencies significant leeway in implementing and enforcing laws.
However, in recent years, the Chevron doctrine has faced criticism from some legal scholars and judges who argued that it had given agencies too much power. They contended that agencies should not be allowed to interpret statutes as they see fit, especially when those interpretations have significant consequences for businesses and individuals.
The Supreme Court's decision to overturn the Chevron doctrine came in response to two cases that challenged a rule issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service. The court ruled that the Chevron doctrine had allowed agencies to overstep their authority and that the court must now play a more active role in interpreting statutes.
Komentar